Archive
Each experiment tests AI against a real business workflow with a human baseline alongside. Newest first. Every page shows the method, the results, the failures and the limits of what was established.
Using the ten structured cases from Experiment #002, a human and an AI each assigned a priority, a next action, a reason and something to avoid. Both converged on the same operational pattern. AI was more conservative about missing information and stronger on operational prerequisites; the human was more commercially proactive and read customer psychology.
Ten synthetic packaging and printing inquiries were converted into a structured table by a human (about 30 minutes) and by an AI model. AI output was more systematic in extraction, completeness and flagging missing information. Human judgment remained stronger on commercial context. No time-saving figure was established.
Research updates
Get new FIELD experiments and findings when we publish them.
